---
title: "Processing Raw Data with openEBGM"
date: "`r Sys.Date()`"
output: rmarkdown::html_vignette
vignette: >
  %\VignetteIndexEntry{Processing Raw Data with openEBGM}
  %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
  %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
---

```{r, echo = FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>")
```

-------

## Using `processRaw()`

The `processRaw()` function calculates actual counts $(N)$ of each
product-symptom combination, expected counts $(E)$ under the row/column
independence assumption, relative reporting ratio $(RR)$, and proportional
reporting ratio $(PRR)$.

```{r, echo = FALSE}
library(openEBGM)
set.seed(5629404)
dat <- data.frame(
  var1 = c(sample(c("product_A", "product_B"), 16, replace = TRUE), "product_C"),
  var2 = c(sample(c("event_1", "event_2"), 16, replace = TRUE), "event_1"),
  stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
dat$id <- 1:nrow(dat)
```

Suppose the data look as so:
```{r}
dat
```

We can calculate $N$, $E$, $RR$, and $PRR$ for the product-symptom pairs:
```{r}
processRaw(data = dat, stratify = FALSE, zeroes = FALSE)
```

## Using Stratification

Stratification can help control for confounding variables. For instance, food
and dietary supplements are sometimes consumed at different rates by different
sexes. Similarly, adverse events associated with these products might occur with
varying rates. Therefore, we might wish to control for this variable (and
possibly others as well).

```{r, echo = FALSE}
set.seed(5629404)
dat <- data.frame(
  var1 = c(sample(c("product_A", "product_B"), 16, replace = TRUE), "product_C"),
  var2 = c(sample(c("event_1", "event_2"), 16, replace = TRUE), "event_1"),
  strat_sex = sample(c("M", "F"), 17, replace = TRUE),
  stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
dat$id <- 1:nrow(dat)
```

Now assume the data look as so:

```{r}
dat
```

Notice that now we have a stratification variable (*'strat'* substring) present.
We can use this variable to get adjusted estimates for the
$EBGM$ scores. Stratification will affect $E$ and $RR$, but not $PRR$. The $E$s
are calculated by summing the expected counts from every stratum. Ideally, each
stratum should contain several unique CAERS reports to insure good estimates of
$E$.

```{r}
processRaw(data = dat, stratify = TRUE, zeroes = FALSE)
```

Notice that we use `stratify = TRUE` to accomodate the new stratification 
variable(s). The calculations for $E$ and $RR$ are adjusted.

Finally, in some cases one may wish to calculate the $E$s for product-symptom 
combinations that do not occur in the data. These can be calculated by using the
`zeroes = TRUE` argument in the `processRaw()` function. It is typically not
required to perform such calculations for zero counts, and doing so can lead to
much longer execution times when estimating hyperparameters. For this reason,
zero counts are only recommended for hyperparameter estimation when convergence
of optimization routines cannot be reached otherwise. If zero counts are used,
data squashing (discussed in the next vignette) should typically follow.
(In fact, data squashing should almost always be used regardless of whether or
not zeroes are used.)

```{r}
processRaw(data = dat, stratify = FALSE, zeroes = TRUE)
```

Next, the *Hyperparameter Estimation with openEBGM* vignette will demonstrate
how to estimate the hyperparameters of the prior distribution.
