Last updated on 2026-04-27 08:50:13 CEST.
| Flavor | Version | Tinstall | Tcheck | Ttotal | Status | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | 2.0.0 | 10.06 | 113.81 | 123.87 | OK | |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | 2.0.0 | 6.19 | 81.04 | 87.23 | OK | |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | 2.0.0 | 18.00 | 188.24 | 206.24 | OK | |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | 2.0.0 | 17.00 | 216.31 | 233.31 | NOTE | |
| r-patched-linux-x86_64 | 2.0.0 | 8.62 | 105.84 | 114.46 | OK | |
| r-release-linux-x86_64 | 2.0.0 | 6.22 | 104.52 | 110.74 | OK | |
| r-release-macos-arm64 | 2.0.0 | 2.00 | 22.00 | 24.00 | ERROR | |
| r-release-macos-x86_64 | 2.0.0 | 7.00 | 858.00 | 865.00 | OK | |
| r-release-windows-x86_64 | 2.0.0 | 14.00 | 147.00 | 161.00 | OK | |
| r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | 2.0.0 | 2.00 | 47.00 | 49.00 | OK | |
| r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | 2.0.0 | 6.00 | 180.00 | 186.00 | OK | |
| r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | 2.0.0 | 20.00 | 171.00 | 191.00 | OK |
Version: 2.0.0
Check: for non-standard things in the check directory
Result: NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
‘test.package.0001’
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc
Version: 2.0.0
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
Running ‘testthat.R’ [2s/5s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
> # This file is part of the standard setup for testthat.
> # It is recommended that you do not modify it.
> #
> # Where should you do additional test configuration?
> # Learn more about the roles of various files in:
> # * https://r-pkgs.org/testing-design.html#sec-tests-files-overview
> # * https://testthat.r-lib.org/articles/special-files.html
>
> library(testthat)
> library(test.assessr)
>
> test_check("test.assessr")
running code coverage for test.package.0001
running code coverage for test.package.0001
code coverage for test.package.0001 successful
running code coverage for test.package.0001
Total coverage returned NaN. This likely means the package had non-standard characteristics.
R coverage for test.package.0001 failed. Read in the covr output to see what went wrong:
running code coverage for test.package.0002
running code coverage for test.package.0002
Total coverage returned NaN. This likely means the package had non-standard characteristics.
R coverage for test.package.0002 failed. Read in the covr output to see what went wrong:
running code coverage for test.package.0003
code coverage for test.package.0003 unsuccessful
running code coverage for test.package.0003
R coverage for test.package.0003 failed. Read in the covr output to see what went wrong:
running code coverage for test.package.0004
code coverage for test.package.0004 unsuccessful
R coverage for test.package.0004 failed. Read in the covr output to see what went wrong:
running code coverage for test.package.0004
code coverage for test.package.0004 successful
R coverage for test.package.0004 had notes: no testable functions found
running code coverage for test.package.0004
R coverage for test.package.0004 had notes: no testable functions found
running code coverage for test.package.0004
code coverage for test.package.0004 successful
running code coverage for tempPkg1d2657c1331
code coverage for tempPkg1d2657c1331 unsuccessful
running code coverage for tempPkg1d2657c1331
R coverage for tempPkg1d2657c1331 failed. Read in the covr output to see what went wrong:
unpacking file1d2197d817e.tar.gz locally
unpacked file1d2197d817e.tar.gz locally
installing test.package.0001 locally
! Interrupting test: install_package_local works correctly
Execution halted
Flavor: r-release-macos-arm64